Questions on Everyone’s Mind

Questions on Everyone’s Mind
1. How can you trust God after this kind of an event?
The Christian answer to issues of suffering and tragedy always has to do with
the Cross. Imagine you are an admirer and companion of Jesus Christ during
his ministry. He is such a powerful worker of miracles that disease and
hunger are almost banished from the countryside when he is present. He is
such a powerful teacher and spiritual guide that thousands of people hear him
gladly and get hope. Then suddenly this man who is the one to help the whole
country is cruelly, unjustly cut off in the very midst of his life–at only
age 33.
What if you stood at the foot of the cross in front of this apparently
senseless act of violence and tragic waste of life, and you said, “I can
never, ever trust God again after an event like this!” And what if you went
home and completely renounced all belief in God saying, “This proves that God
is either a monster or indifferent or he doesn’t exist”? If you did that,
you would have been missing the greatest act of God’s love and redemption in
history. But of course no one at that time (and only a few for a good while
afterwards) could fathom what had happened.
The Cross of Jesus Christ is the main reason I can trust God after this kind
of event. First, the Cross is the best proof that God is not remote from us in our suffering. (See question #3 and #5 below.) Second, the Cross and its aftermath shows us how dangerous it is to judge God on surface appearances. His way is to work strength through weakness and bring resurrection and new power through death. (See question # below.)
2. Is this a judgment from God on our country?
I don’t think we can infer from prosperity that God is pleased with us, nor can we know from disaster that he is displeased with us. In Romans 1:18ff
Paul hints that the worst punishment may be to get the happy life you want! That way you never wake up to your pride, self-righteousness or need for him.
On the other hand, Luke 21:16-19 is a remarkable assertion that God’s loving protection of his people does not mean exemption for suffering. Jesus says,
“They will put some of you to death. All men will hate you because of me. But not a hair of your head will perish.” This is startling to us. We would think
that ‘not a hair of your head will perish’ must mean that we can’t be attacked and killed, but that is not so. Jesus is saying that God exercises
the most detailed and loving control of our lives (“not a hair”), and that in the broad scope of things every event works out for our good and his glory (Romans 8:28). But our life-plan may still include terrible tragedy, just as did Jesus’ life plan. (Why should servants be above their master?)
What do we learn from all this?
We learn that we cannot be sure that disasters imply divine judgment nor that
prosperity implies divine approval. So how can we know whether God is
displeased with America or not? The only way to know that for sure is to
consult the Scriptures and its standards.
But this does not mean we cannot ‘hear God’s voice’ in a time of tragedy. We
can. Jesus was also asked whether certain corporate and personal tragedies
were “judgments” of God. In Luke 13 he was asked if a massacre and
(ironically) a falling tower were signs of God’s judgment on those killed.
His answer was an unequivocal “no”, but he added cryptically “you yourselves
should repent”. That fits with C.S. Lewis’ famous statement that “in
prosperity God whispers to us, but in adversity he shouts at us.” God speaks
to us in all troubles.
So what is God saying in times of tragedy and
suffering? I think the message is different depending on how touched you are
by the disaster.
If you have actually lost a loved one, I think you are being called to look
to the only God (so to speak) of all the faiths of the world who literally
lost a child. Jesus was himself the victim of a hostile, physical attack. I
don’t think you will really be able to handle the brutality of life either
with a) a general God who has not suffered, or with b) a universe without any
God in it at all. Both of those options bring no consolation. If there is no
God, then even your outrage is trivialized. This is just the way life is.
There is no justice. On the other hand, if there is a general God up in the
sky, how do we know he cares? But the God and Father of Jesus Christ gives us
a new resource that comforts deeply. He proved his commitment to ending our
suffering by getting involved in it himself.
If you have not directly lost a loved one, but rather find yourself dazed,
shaken, and fearful, God is saying to you: “Wake up to your need for me and
wake up to what real security is. No military power or technology or human
factor can make you safe. Only in the very center of my will is there any
safety. You don’t have the human ability to control things. You need me.”
C.S. Lewis pointed out that times of war or disaster don’t really increase
the amount of misery and death in the world, but they concentrate it and wake
us from our illusion that life is manageable. “If we had foolish hopes about
human culture, they are now shattered. If we thought we were building up a
heaven on earth, if we looked for something that would turn the present world
from a place of pilgrimage into a permanent city satisfying the soul of man,
we are disillusioned, and not a moment too soon. In ordinary times only the
wise realize it. Now (in war-time) the stupidest of us knows it.”
(C.S.Lewis, “Learning in War-Time”)
3. How does vengeance not manifest itself in the Christian community?
In most people’s minds there is a false “either-or” between vengeance and
forgiveness. But that is a mistake. Forgiveness is not simply resignation or capitulation to evil.
In vengeance we simply pommel the enemy to hurt them worse than we were hurt.
Our motivation is neither the common good nor the upholding of justice and
truth per se. We simply want to assuage our own pain by seeing our enemy in
worse pain than we were.
Forgiveness, on the other hand, is not ‘letting him
off scot free’. Forgiveness is a means of giving up the hate and the desire for personal vengeance so that we can then pursue justice and maybe even reconciliation. I have personally found that I can’t really confront a
wrong-doer effectively about his or her sin until I’ve forgiven it. Then I am
sometimes able to help the person see their wrong, or at least I am able to
wisely pursue justice and restitution. But if I keep my heart full of hate,
I never get anything done except fuel the cycle of retaliation. When I aim
not to bring a person to see the truth, but rather only to hurt them, I never
get anywhere. In other words, forgiveness does not ‘let a person
off’–rather it frees my heart to pursue justice and/or reconciliation,
depending on the reaction of the wrongdoer.
At the very least, forgiveness prevents me from becoming as evil as the other
The basic plot-dynamic of The Lord of the Rings revolves around the
conundrum of the Great Ring of the Dark Lord. The ‘good’ people have found
his ring, but they can’t use his own power against him without becoming just
like the one who made it. They can, as it were, defeat the Dark Lord, but
only by becoming an evil Dark Lord in his place. Unless we forgive our
enemies, our anger could turn us as demonic as it has turned them.
Now that we know what forgiveness is, how can we do it? I don’t know how to
do that without embracing the message of the cross. The Cross means at least
that a) God so hates evil and injustice that he is willing to come suffer
himself in order to end it, but b) we are so tainted by evil as well that
Jesus had to die so that we could be forgiven. Both of these truths are
absolutely essential for forgiveness. Croatian theologian Miroslav Volf puts
it perfectly:
Forgiveness flounders because I exclude the enemy from the community of
humans and exclude myself from the community of sinners. But no one can be in
the presence of [the Cross] for long without overcoming this double
exclusion….When one knows that the torturer will not eternally triumph over
the victim, one is freed to rediscover the torturer’s humanity and imitate
God’s love for that person. And when one knows that the love of God is
greater than [my] sin, one is free to see oneself in the light of the justice
of God and so rediscover one’s own sinfulness. (Miroslav Volf, The Spacious
Heart, p.57)
4. How do both nation and individual cope with grief?
It is interesting to see that the basic process of grief works itself out at both the individual and the corporate level. First comes numbness, shock, and
an air of unreality. In the first stage it is necessary to simply express emotions together. We hold hands, cry together, and embrace. It is not a
time for moralizing and instructing and looking for lessons. It is a time to
“weep with those who weep” (Rom.12:15).
But second comes a stage of anger and/or creeping despair. In this stage
there is a persistent need to ‘make sense out of all this’. People have to
find a way to think about the tragedy so that it does not make the rest of
their lives meaningless. Ironically, there seems to be no way for people to
deal with grief at this level without having recourse to the basic gospel
dynamic of death-leading-to-resurrection. This is the basic approach that the
mayor and governor have invoked and used. They say: “Out of the loss of good
things will come even greater good things. We will come together as a
community as never before. We will be brave as we have not been before. We
will find victory through this defeat and strength through our weakness. This
‘death’ will lead to a resurrected city better than the one before.”
I personally believe that this is the right way for NYC to deal with its
grief. It must reflect the gospel dynamic of death-into-resurrection at a
civic level. Through this New York could become less a place of
individualistic achievement and more of a community. Through this Americans
could become on the one hand humbler and more sensitive to the injustice and
pain in the world and yet more committed to and (rightly) proud of our nation
than ever before.
In summary, we could become stronger through this
weakness, not just in spite of it. That is the basic gospel dynamic.
However, the very deepest and best way to handle grief is to believe and use
the gospel itself on the heart. Unlike any other religion, Christianity has at its very heart an act of tragic and unjust suffering and death. It has at
its heart a man literally abandoned by God, crying out and unheard, yet this
is the way God brings his salvation and hope into the world!
How does this
help us?
First, when we trust in his death on our behalf, it takes away fear for
ourselves. We know that now even death can’t harm us. “Death used to be an
executioner, but the gospel has made him just a gardener.” (George Herbert)
This frees us to love and sacrifice for others in such a way that makes the
broken world more livable. We don’t need to amass power and wealth in order
to prove ourselves.
Second, when we see how the very best man who ever lived
had to suffer, it undermines our own self-pity or bitterness. If God could
bring life and good out of the tragedy of the cross, then he can work through
other suffering as well.
Third, the cross gives us hope for the whole future.
The Cross means that God is so committed to ending the suffering and
brokenness of the world that he would himself become embroiled in it and pay
the ultimate cost! And if we ask: “Why isn’t the suffering over yet?” the
answer is: “We don’t know, but here’s the proof that he’s committed to it!
The cross!” Only Christianity has a God who has suffered, proving his
commitment to us in our brokenness. “To our wounds only thy wounds can speak,
and no God has wounds but thou alone.” (Edward Shillito)
If I have hope like that–not just for a slightly stronger city, but for a
literal new creation–then I can face anything. In The Lord of the Rings,
one character is facing terrible evil, and suddenly he looks at a star in the
sky. “Like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end
the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high
beauty for ever beyond its reach. His song in the Tower had been defiance
rather than hope; for then he was thinking of himself. Now for a moment his
own fate…ceased to trouble him…putting away all fear…” Hope is not the
same as defiance. Many people will turn to defiance to deal with their grief
and pain rather than to hope. Hope comes from a certainty that there is a
Judge and a Redeemer. The Cross proves that God is both.
5. Should America retaliate?
Under question #4 we looked at the problem with simple cries for vengeance.
But what should America do now? This question moves outside of my area of
competence and wisdom. But here are a few observations that should be kept in
mind as we move forward.
This is ‘post-modern’ war, and it is different than anything we have seen
a) First, there are no rules. (We can kill civilians, children,
b) Second, it is not nation-on-nation. It is an international
network of world terrorism attacking the multi-national corporations of world
c) Third, it is ‘semiotic’, aimed not at factories and air bases
but at our icons and symbols in order psychologically debilitate and
d) Fourth, it is deliberately and bitterly ironic. It uses no
bombs or guns, but our own technology against us. It is the very picture of
Neitzschean ressentiment.
This is a new chapter in history. A knee-jerk ‘warfare as usual’ reaction
will not likely be effective. Instead, I think that what is called for is a
deeper change in the way America thinks about itself and the relationship to
the rest of the world. When commentators say that the frivolous, me-centered
decade of the 90’s is officially over, that rings true to me. But I am not
able to see what lies ahead. That’s beyond my expertise.
6. What are Christian people to do?
In The City of God St.Augustine contrasts the “City of Man” (which is the nexus of human systems based on power and pride) and the “City of God” (which
is God’s Spirit working through the message of the Cross to create new human
communities based on love, service, and giving.) Augustine tells Christians
to love the human city in which they live but to remember how it is distinct
from the coming City. The City of God does not respond to an ‘attack’ with
the firepower of guns but with greater and more sacrificial service in word
and deed. And this is the way it ‘wins’ over the world. The hymn goes: For
not with swords loud clashing, nor roll of stirring drums, but deeds of love
and mercy the heav’nly kingdom comes.
Christianity is unique because its
central reality is that real influence comes not to those who take but those
who give, not to those who rule but those who serve, not to those who accrue
power but to those who sacrifice.
This is a tremendous moment for the “City of God” to show Jesus’ love in more
powerful ways. We should be available to our neighbors and friends spiritually
to listen and pray with and for them, not to preach at them. We should also
be available to our whole city to meet material needs. Christians should not
sit back and wait for the phone to ring–we should pro-actively fan out
through the city and look for ways to help. After all, nobody asked Jesus to
give himself for us. He came to us and gave us what we needed.
The Heroes of Flight 93 TV Special Available on DVD with Bonus Features…
Join the discussion on Facebook


Use this link to shop and support Christian Activities


Enjoy this website? Please spread the word :)